PERMIT GUIDE

As-Built Drawings for a Permit: What Jurisdictions Accept

Every alteration, legalization and tenant improvement starts with drawings of what exists. Reviewers accept them when they are measured, to scale, consistent and clear about what is existing and what is new.

Researched and maintained by SASHKOV · Last verified

2026-11-12

LAST VERIFIED

2026-11-12

SASHKOV CAN ALSO

Measure and document the building as it stands, produce scaled existing and proposed drawings, and use them as the base for the permit set.

An as-built, or existing conditions, set shows a building as it stands today. Permit reviewers use it to judge every proposed change: an addition, a wall removal, a tenant improvement or a legalization of work built without a permit. When the existing drawings are wrong, everything drawn on top of them is wrong too.

When you need them

  • Alterations and additions, where the reviewer must see existing and proposed side by side.

  • Legalizing unpermitted work. Portland, for example, requires the same permits as if the work had not been done, so the work has to be drawn as built.

  • Tenant improvements and changes of occupancy, where exits, occupant load and accessibility are checked against the existing space.

  • Damage repairs, where the record before demolition defines the scope.

What reviewers look for

  • Scale. Portland requires commercial drawings to be to scale where needed to verify code compliance, at least 11 by 17, with text no smaller than 3/32 inch or 12 point.

  • Existing versus new. A clear legend separating existing to remain, existing to be removed and new work.

  • Consistency. Plans, elevations and sections that agree with each other and with the site plan.

  • Site plan. Property lines, setbacks and structures, drawn from the best available record or a survey.

  • Ownership of drawings. Portland notes that another professional's drawings cannot be used without that professional's permission.

What gets as-builts rejected

  • Sketches not to scale, or dimensions that do not close.

  • Missing sheets, such as a plan with no elevations.

  • Existing and new work drawn the same way.

  • A site plan that does not match the property record.

Measured or reused

Old permit drawings can save time, but they rarely match what was built after years of changes. Reviewers judge the drawings in front of them, so a field measured set is the safer base for any permit that depends on existing conditions.

Common questions

What is the difference between as-built and existing conditions drawings?

They describe the same thing: the building as it stands. As-built is often used after construction, existing conditions before a new project.

Can I use old permit drawings as my existing plans?

Only if they still match the building and you have permission from the professional who prepared them. Most buildings have changed since.

Do as-built drawings need a stamp?

Usually not for documenting existing conditions. Any new structural work shown on the set may need an engineer.

What scale and size should they be?

Portland requires commercial drawings to scale where needed, at least 11 by 17, with text no smaller than 3/32 inch. Check the local submittal standards.

How SASHKOV handles it

  • Measures the building in the field and records structure, openings and systems.

  • Produces scaled existing plans, elevations and sections in Revit.

  • Marks existing to remain, to be removed and new work clearly for the reviewer.

  • Uses the record as the base for the permit set and any correction response.

Where a building requires a licensed architect or engineer of record, SASHKOV brings them into the contract.

See Existing Conditions Documentation for the full scope. For permits that started without it, read How to Respond to a Portland Permit Checksheet.

Need the building recorded? Send the address, building size and purpose, and SASHKOV will scope the record and timeline in business days.

Sources

Guides are general information researched from each jurisdiction’s published sources on the date shown. Fees and rules change; confirm with the permitting authority before you act.

Have a site, a permit or a notice? Send it over.

Where SASHKOV’s projects take shape across
Oregon & Washington

Where SASHKOV’s projects take
shape across Oregon & Washington

OREGON

Portland Metro

Multnomah County:

Beaverton

Hillsboro

Banks

Unincorporated Washington County

Milwaukie

Oak Grove

Estacada

Rhododendron Unincorporated Clackamas County

Willamette Valley

Lane County:

Eugene

Oregon Coast

Tillamook County:

Tillamook

Bay City

Central Oregon

Deschutes County:

Bend

OREGON

WASHINGTON

Puget Sound

Lake Stevens

Edmonds

Unincorporated Snohomish County

Southwest Washington

Brush Prairie

Yacolt

Unincorporated Clark County

WASHINGTON

© 2026 SASHKOV GROUP LLC dba SASHKOV. All Rights Reserved.

© 2026 SASHKOV GROUP LLC dba SASHKOV.

All Rights Reserved.

UEI TENDYXDNE578 · CAGE 26WF7

NAICS 541611 · 541340 · 541618 · 541990

UEI TENDYXDNE578 · CAGE 26WF7

NAICS 541611 · 541340 · 541618 · 541990

Insured: General Liability & Professional Liability (E&O)

Insured:

General Liability &

Professional Liability (E&O)